Regarding your comments of August 25th @ 3:50 p.m.
----------------
It is just babble. A ruler with markings as fine as 1/100 as xcole refers to is unreadable. I have a 6 scale with scribed, not painted, markings for 1/10 and 1/50 on one side, 1/32 and 1/64 on the other. The 1/50 and 1/64 are the limit of readability. Beyond that, you need vernier callipers or a micrometer, which uses some other principle to make the scale readable. The tool & die trade does not use fractions, at least for precise work, they use 1/1000, or 1/10000, if they are actually common scales. Many arent. Dont worry, I have plenty of napoleonic scales too, but in the United States, you need at least one of each. It does show how complicated you can make common weights & measures if you try hard.
----------------
Jomo, thank you for your balanced and measured comments.
Oh, by the way, I just happened to be perambulating past a tool store yesterday, and so I went inside and asked the store clerk to show me some steel rulers.
There were several steel rulers from two american manufacturers, but there was one that wasnt: in fact no manufacturer was shown at all.
And as you, Jomo, are such a fan of unidentified products from the culturalist, propagandist, subsidiaritist, proportionalititist, and socialist nether regions of the world, as compared to the backwoods United States of America, I will take my time to describe in excruciating detail that steel ruler shown to me yesterday.
MECHANICS STEEL RULER
1 1/8 wide
about 1/32 thick, maybe more
flush @ 0 end
@ the 12 end, continues on for a 5/8 extension
beginning 5/16 of the 5/8 extension is straight
end 5/16 of the 5/8 extension is rounded
3/16 hole in middle of 5/8 extension (for hanging on wall peg?)
TOPSIDE OF MECHANICS STEEL RULER
the word ENGLAND scribed in middle of ruler between 11() & 12() marks
TOP OF TOPSIDE OF MECHANICS STEEL RULER
1/20 marks scribed between flush 0() end & 3() mark
the figure 20 scribed between 2/20 & 8/20 marks
1/50 marks scribed between 3() & 4() marks
the figure 50 scribed between 3 & 3 15/50 marks
1/100 marks scribed between 4() & 5() marks
the figure 100 scribed between 4 & 4 30/100 marks
1/10 marks scribed between 5() & 12() marks
the figure 10 scribed between 5 & 5 3/10 marks
BOTTOM OF TOPSIDE OF MECHANICS STEEL RULER
1/24 marks scribed between flush 0() end & 3() mark
the figure 24 scribed between 4/24 & 8/24 marks
1/48 marks scribed between 3() & 4() marks
the figure 48 scribed between 3 4/48 & 3 12/48 marks
1/96 marks scribed between 4() & 5() marks
the figure 96 scribed between 4 8/96 & 4 24/96 marks
1/12 marks scribed between 5() & 12() marks
the figure 12 scribed between 5 1/12 & 5 3/12 marks
TOP OF BOTTOMSIDE OF MECHANICS STEEL RULER
1/2 m/m marks scribed between flush 0 (c/m) end & 10 (c/m) mark
the figures ½ M/M scribed between 2/2 m/m & 14/2 m/m marks
1 m/m marks scribed between 10 (c/m) & 30 5/10 (c/m) marks
the figures M/M scribed between 10 3/10 c/m & 10 7/10 c/m marks
BOTTOM OF BOTTOMSIDE OF MECHANICS STEEL RULER
1/32 marks scribed between flush 0() end & 3() mark
the figures 32 scribed between 4/32 & 8/32 marks
1/64 marks scribed between 3() & 4() marks
the figures 64 scribed between 3 4/64 & 3 16/64 marks
1/16 marks scribed between 5() & 12() marks
the figures 16 scribed between 5 1/16 & 5 4/16
I guess they use M/M in the United Kingdom, instead of m/m, or at least they do in the England State part. Or did you say the abbreviation m/m was never used? Oh, I must be slandering you, my apologies. I never realized there was a nitwit difference between m/m and M/M.
O.K., Jomo, thanks for everything, and do not hesitate in the future to post your comments on this bullet-in-board, for passers-by can always rely upon your enlightened elucidation for its extreme veracity.
Personally, I dislike scales where every inch is subdivided a different way. I find them hard to use. I have never seen subdivisions in the 1/12, 1/24, 1/48, 1/96 series. Since you like dozens, you NEED to buy this ruler.
When I need to use inches, I'll stick to something that more directly relates to decimals (1/10, 1/20, or 1/50)
Bud
Re: 1 = 100 cal.
August 28 2005, 5:12 AM
I like inches to be divided fractionally upto sixteenths. After that, I prefer decimals.
martin
Re: 1 = 100 cal.
August 30 2005, 8:33 AM
<<
guess they use M/M in the United Kingdom, instead of m/m, or at least they do in the England State part. Or did you say the abbreviation m/m was never used? Oh, I must be slandering you, my apologies. I never realized there was a nitwit difference between m/m and M/M.
>>
Actually we use "mm" old boy. (lower case, no oblique between the letters).