K-Day? No Way!
--


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Success at last at Eastbourne

March 13 2003 at 2:49 PM
Council of ARM 

-
A significant victory for Imperial measurements has been achieved at Eastbourne, very much due to local anti-metric campaigners Andrew Dakyns and Rev. Norman Greenfield, particularly the latter who kept up the pressure despite receiving obfuscating answers from Eastbourne Borough Council.

The Council put up signs every 500 m_tr_s along the promenade, with the help of funding by an Irish 'healthy heart' charity which in turn got some funding from the European Union. When the good burghers of Eastbourne decided to accept the offer of funding the signs (along with glossy leaflets telling people how any m_tr_s they should run or walk evey day to keep healthy), they told the health charity they were to be in miles. The charity came back swiftly and said: "You only get grant aid from us if the signs are in kilometres".

Like true Brits, they gave way immediately to the demands of the Irish, and up went the signs at 500 m_tr_ intervals along the 5.7 mile promenade.

Several letters, including one from ARM and another from U.K. Independence Party M.E.P. Jeffrey Titford, pointed out the illegality of the signs, but the Council kept on evading the point.

Last week Meridian TV showed a clip of the newly-amended signs, now in Imperial measurements. A spokesperson for Eastbourne Borough Council did not concede that their signs had ever been illegal, but admitted that "the public found the metric signs confusing"


Q.E.D.


[P.S. We think a total of 26 metric distances have now been converted back to Imperial by the Council, which would take the number of demetricated signs in the United Kingdom known to ARM up to 1,975]








 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Ross

Re: Success at last at Eastbourne

March 13 2003, 3:46 PM 

"The Council put up signs every 500 m_tr_s along the promenade"

"along with glossy leaflets telling people how any m_tr_s they should run or walk evey day to keep healthy"

"up went the signs at 500 m_tr_ intervals along the 5.7 mile promenade."

And the imperial lobby calls us childish for refusing to use imperial terms!

 
 
SteveH

Re: Success at last at Eastbourne

March 13 2003, 4:02 PM 

....successfully wound up!

 
 
Tony Bennett

Not 'Childish'

March 13 2003, 6:14 PM 

Re: "and the imperial lobby calls us childish..."

Since when?

Authoritarian, Dictatorial, Dogmatic, Domineering, Heavy-handed, Insistent, Intolerant, Oppressive, Repressive, Totalitarian, Tyrannical, Wrong...yes. But not 'Childish' (*)


* I admit I got the Thesaurus out for that list





 
 
Pip

Re: Success at last at Eastbourne

March 13 2003, 9:57 PM 

If the actual legend on these signs was "m_tr_s" then the confusion is not surprising.

 
 
Pip

Re: Success at last at Eastbourne

March 13 2003, 10:12 PM 

Well said SteveH.

'wind-up' just about sums up the whole ARM campaign.

 
 
Tony Bennett

Like Clockwork

March 14 2003, 8:32 AM 

It's absolutely true that we are 'wind-up' merchants - we 'spring' into action




 
 
SteveH

Re: Success at last at Eastbourne

March 14 2003, 10:13 AM 

"pip", "joke" and "backfire" 'springs' to mind!

 
 
Ralf

Re: Success at last at Eastbourne

March 15 2003, 5:49 AM 

Steve,

how many times are you planning to use the "XXX springs to mind" response ?

Ralf

 
 
SteveH

Re: Success at last at Eastbourne

March 24 2003, 11:35 AM 

"Many" "times" and "more" spring to mind

 
 
Current Topic - Success at last at Eastbourne  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Don't give them an inch.