Discussion board for the Philadelphia Association for Critical Thinking
--

 index  

but, does it "mean sh*t to a tree"?

April 28 2005 at 8:31 PM

  (Login gollyjeepers)


Response to Well, it won't be a technical sense.

 



It is defined that {0,2,4,6,8,...} and {0,1,3,5,7,...} and {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,...} are all the same size because they are all denumerable. (By whom it is defined, I don't know; I parrot your teaching here). If it matters to physics, then the definition is meaningful and useful, otherwise (and regardless of it's self consistency) it is just an arbitrary and useless invention of man's intelligence.

Can you give ONE real life example where it physically matters in the slightest whether some people think that the set {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,...} is twice as large as either the set {0,2,4,6,8,...} or the set {0,1,3,5,7,...} as opposed to the accepted er... wisdom that all three sets are equal in size?

I am hoping that you can. Otherwise you just wasted my time except for the mental excerise that I got. (not inconsequential, that)




---Al

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Who's wasting whose time?? - Bill on Apr 29, 11:30 AM
    1. elaboration - Al on Apr 29, 12:51 PM
      1. I'm working on... - Bill on Apr 29, 3:31 PM
        1. golden showers are officially outré - Al on Apr 29, 4:08 PM
          1. Re: Golden Showers - Bill on Apr 30, 1:00 PM
            1. with baited breath, barely contained ... - Al on Apr 30, 2:45 PM
              1. The ground rules keep shifting - Bill on Apr 30, 5:24 PM
                1. wow --- no they don't - Al on May 1, 10:51 AM
                  1. OK... - Bill on May 1, 12:25 PM
     
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
See Phact's web page at http://www.phact.org/phact