child A (with autism) was cloned to see if the clone would not have autism when not given vaccines, etc.
*what would happen to child A when child AA is born?
If the idea is to not get rid of child A, and continue caring for both children, then why not just have another child and dont give that child the vaccines etc.?
this is the issue that is discussed in many circles of disability.
it is an issue which will not go away now that there is so much genetic manipulation to "eliminate" certain pockets of population.
either through amniocynthesis, ultrasound, or cloning in the future... and am sure it will become the future, humankind has not ever discovered something and decided that they do not want to use it.
even with nuclear bombs, it is still not abandonned.
the whole idea of eliminating certain pockets of population, or making us on the brink of extinction is oppressive no matter through which perspective it is suportted.
vaccine damaged persons surely are not what "nature" made them to be... the way they were born...
and neither are brain damaged head injury victims, stroke victims, spinalcord injured, got-a-tumor-removed-from-the-head-and-left-me-brain-injured persons...the list goes on...
some of this is preventalbe.. like vaccine injuries, some head injuries, (seat belts, helmets, better safety measures, had read somewhere that a car could be build so safe that noone will get injured in a accident, only reason is not done is because itis too expensive... same story, money dicatates everything), some strokes, brain tumors... etc. etc. manyof these are preventable...
there are so much that goes 'wrong" with people as we journey on through our lives, that if we were to clone ourselves, and eliminate any of the influences that may have created our serious disabilities, then we may just end up as the "boy in the bubble"...
|
