I have to agree here with Talis on all points regarding employers and they're monitoring of employees. i'm also going to attempt to expand on it a little bit...so someone please correct me if something in what I say is incorrect. If I recall correctly, employers are not responsible for their employees behavior when it does not involve company business or off of company property, at least here in America. Now, an employer may choose to fire an employee due to behavior "off-site", but that does not make the employer responsible for the employee's behavior which resulted in the firing. With regards to no news story on the RUG site, or involving RUG...my understanding is that a given company "leases" from RUG the right to produce and perform a presentation of any of RUG's musicals, meaning that RUG is not directly responsible for the actions of the employees of that company, or any company they subcontract with to help run the show or security. Now, if something happens that involves the production directly, they may post a news story. Otherwise, RUG does not need to post a story...whether the publicity is bad or good. It seems to me that RUG has little to do with this, and the company or companies that you should concern yourself with are the company staging the show, the theatre it is staged at, or the local union involved with the theatre...most likely one of the latter two. There's more I want to say with regards to this, but it does not wish to become concious thought at this time.
