The claim is that post should be answered completely within one post. Here is what happens:
1. A post is generally about one doctrine of law.
2. Someone responds by mixing law (using more or one doctrine).
3. The response gets very confusing because it addresses two many points of law.
The only solution is to not mix law - seperate the response to the proper doctrines for complete discussion. Generally the response is wrong because the responder is using avoidance to not address an issue that he lacks knowledge of.
Notice the response to various doctrines that I post. Very few address this issue with a "basis in law" on that issue. They use avoidance to either attack or bring up some issue they want to discuss. That is why you have a judge in a court room - he controls the direction of the case. Here we are trying to talk law without anyone wanting to stay on an issue.
The general discussion is "without a basis in law" while I keep trying to force it back to specific law. Trying to reach those who have a desire to learn about law.
