--


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Communism and Liberalism - The Undeniable Link

August 10 2001 at 8:56 AM
The Sharpened Pen 

-
There is ample proof that the intent behind supporting homosexuality as policy, stems from a desire among communists to alter the social fabric of western democracies, hoping for an end result of system collapse - perhaps that is why many communist nations have traditionally opposed mainstreaming homosexuality in their own backyards.

Gus Hall formed the Communist Party Legislative Action Network (CPLAN) in the 1980's. Its purpose then was the infiltration and eventual takeover of the national Democratic Party.

Political Affairs, the theoretical journal of the CP USA, declared in its March 1987 issue:

"We must be more organizationally involved in the Democratic Party. Our program will unfold in the 1989-1992 quadrennial cycle primarily through the medium of the Democratic Party."

Charlene Mitchell, head of the Communist Afro-America Commission, stated on June 9, 1983 in the People's Weekly World:

"The thrust of our candidates must be to prevent the Democratic Party from any shift to the right and force a more progressive platform and program in the 1984 campaign."

Secret Communists who masquerade as "progressives" are the key in swinging the Democratic Party to the far-left. Gus Hall told C.P. leaders as far back as 1972 that the Party was like the three legs of a stool. He said that the Party wants total power in America, "but until that day comes, the one operating leg would be the liberal wing of the Democratic Party."

Hall added that, "It is clear we are going to work with people who for some time will be riding two horses in the field of political action." He said that local Party cells should not call themselves "communists" but "progressives" and their main issues should be minorities, woman's rights, gay rights, and others promoted by "liberals."

From Freeper exton1: Former FBI agent, Cleon Skoussen, in 1958, in his book, THE NAKED COMMUNIST, revealed among other things, these long term goals of the communist agenda. The information is in the Congressional Record August 1963 and in the Communist Manifesto:

-U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

-Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the U.S. would be a demonstration of moral strength.

-Permit free trade between all nations regardless of communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
-Provide American aid to all nations regardless of communist domination.
Set up East West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.S.

-Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the United Nations.

-Promote the United Nations as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

-Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

-Do away with loyalty oaths.

-Capture one or both of the political parties in the U.S.

-Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

-Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current communist propaganda. Get control of the teachers associations.

-Gain control of all student newspapers.
Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

-Gain control of key positions in radio, TV and motion pictures.
-Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them censorship and a violation of free speech and free press.

-Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures and TV.

-Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as normal, natural and healthy.

-Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with social religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a religious crutch.

-Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principles of separation of church and state.

-Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

-Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the grounds that it was only a minor part in the big picture.

-Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the communist apparatus.

-Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

-Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
-Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.

-Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American traditions; that students and special interest groups should rise up and use united force to solve economic, political and social problems.

Ether Zone 4/6/00 Steve Farrell "…… A half century ago, in a classic exchange between two men on opposite ends of the moral and political spectrum, Soviet Premier Nikative Kruschev bragged to American Patriot, and Secretary of Agriculture, Ezra Taft Benson: "Your grandchildren will live under communism!" To which Secretary Benson enthusiastically replied: "If I have it my way, your grandchildren will live free!" Kruschev, undeterred, fired back: "Oh you Americans! You're so gullible! We'll spoon feed you socialism, until you're Communists and don't' even know it. We'll never have to fire a shot!"
(implicating a policy of slow social change)

Using the Democratic Party to Implement those changes:

WorldNetDaily 7/22/99 J R Nyquist "… I first heard of Bill Clinton 16 years ago. Here is how it happened. I was getting a teaching credential, and one of my classes was on adolescent psychology. The professor in this course, who was a very admirable teacher, seemed to favor me. One day, after class, she invited me to a 7 p.m. meeting at the Science Lecture Hall. At the time I didn't know she was a Marxist, and I didn't know the meeting would be political. She said that if I cared about education in the state of California I would attend. Having the night off from work I decided on going, partly owing to curiosity. Well, I couldn't have been more surprised if it had been a coven of witches. Arriving early at the Science Lecture Hall, I found communist literature -- books and pamphlets -- stacked on tables in the lobby. A visiting professor was the speaker. He gave a rousing talk on overthrowing the "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie" in America. How would this be accomplished? By taking over the Democratic Party through its left wing. The speaker said it was possible to elect a stealth socialist president, who would effect a peaceful transition to socialism during the next great economic down-turn. Capitalism would be unmasked as a bankrupt system. The people would then support a new socialist system. All businesses would be nationalized by the government and run like the Post Office. This socialist president, said the speaker, could be elected in either 1988 or 1992. The only problem was that of timing. When would the next major economic downturn hit? Some days later I went to visit my professor at her office hours. We talked about the speaker and the book he had written. We talked about Marxism and the idea of changing the system. Then, suddenly, my professor said: "We have such high hopes for this young Arkansas governor, Bill Clinton." That was the first time I heard Bill Clinton's name. …"

WorldNetDaily 7/22/99 J R Nyquist "… But it wasn't the first time I'd heard this idea of taking over the left wing of the Democratic Party and electing a stealth socialist president. I'd first heard that idea in 1981, when I was a senior at the University of California. The left wing activist, Derek Shearer, came to speak on the subject of "economic democracy." Two radical friends of mine dragged me to hear him, though I had my heart set on a game of chess that day. So I went to listen to Shearer's talk, and I sat there in the front row, concentrating on his theory of "economic democracy," thinking to myself: This is just like Marxism. After Shearer finished speaking I went up and asked him, point blank. "Mr. Shearer, what is the difference between Marxism and "economic democracy"? He looked at me a bit suspiciously for a second, then he said, "I probably shouldn't say this, but there is no difference." I had a long discussion with Shearer about why he wasn't a forthright Marxist. He said that Marxism was unpopular with the American people, who have a knee-jerk negative reaction to words like "socialism" and "communism," even though -- according to Shearer -- these are perfectly good words. Therefore, in order to win Americans over to socialist ways of thinking, you need to create a new, euphemistic language -- a kind of linguistic deception. Shearer also talked about taking over the Democratic Party through its left wing and electing a stealth socialist president. As it happens, Derek Shearer is a friend of Bill Clinton….."

WorldNetDaily 7/22/99 J R Nyquist "…Does anyone remember that Hillary Clinton arranged to give $15,000 to the National Lawyer's Guild -- an organization founded in the 1930s as a branch of the Communist Party USA -- when she chaired the New World Foundation? Does anybody deny her assistance to various Marxist-inspired causes, from the Black Panthers to the Christic Institute and CISPES (a front for Central American Marxist terrorists)? Bill Clinton was not merely a draft evader during the Vietnam War. The truth is, he was for the Viet Cong terrorists. And that is why he went to Moscow and Prague almost 30 years ago. That is why he married the young radical, Hillary Clinton. And that is why he was friends with Derek Shearer. It also explains why my professor of 16 years ago, who was a Marxist, had such high hopes for that young governor, Bill Clinton. Seven months ago an intelligence professional, whose credentials are impeccable, told me something quite alarming. He told of a taped conversion between two Czech Communist officials. They were discussing a young American college student -- Bill Clinton -- who was then visiting Prague. They mentioned that he was expected to attend a meeting at a certain place which was reserved for the recruitment of Communist bloc agents. "Where is this tape now," I asked. "Nobody seems to know," he answered….."

Bill Clinton's election as President was hailed by Communist Party USA boss Gus Hall as "a great victory" (People's Weekly World, Nov. 14, 1992).



World Net Daily 5/6/00 Anthony LoBaido "…… During the 1980s, Knight was involved in a unique project. He and others were asked by members of the Reagan administration to draft a list of goals that would be the framework of a Marxist president if one were to be elected to lead the United States. "We concluded that a Marxist and / or communist president, if he ever came to power, would focus on the transfer of national sovereignty at every opportunity to international organizations. He or she would also weaken the armed forces physically, mentally and spiritually. The 'dumbing down' of our public school educational system would also accelerate." …………"Furthermore, we decided that a Marxist president would assist all or most of America's enemies -- Russia, China, Cuba, radical Islam, North Korea and others. He would disregard the Constitution at every opportunity and rule by decree, meaning executive orders would earmark such an administration. Bogus arms control agreements, buying-off or intimidating Congress by stealing the FBI files of its members, controlling the media and trying to stop all alternative media would also be major goals." ……… In addressing the two terms in office of President Bill Clinton, Gen. Knight is resolute. "What has Clinton done in this regard? He has hit every one of the above actions and more. I have a file over six inches thick with articles describing these actions. The salami slices add-up to a message of treason. Sex and perjury were the wrong impeachment offenses. It should have been on his treachery and failure to live up to his oath-of-office. ……"

WorldNetDaily 9/19/00 Dr Samual Blumenfeld "....... Back in 1993, I received a 49-page report entitled "Secret: FBI Documents Link Bill & Hillary Clinton to Marxist-Terrorist Network," published by the Sunset Research Group of Wichita, Kan. It was a meticulously documented report showing the connections of the Clintons to the Institute for Policy Studies, a Marxist think tank in Washington. Clinton's top economic advisor was Derek Shearer, an IPS operative and advocate of Marxist socialism. Shearer's sister Brooke was also Hillary's traveling companion. The report states: ........ In a 1980 book he authored, Shearer confided that he and others were planning to so influence the Democratic Party that a President sharing their Marxist-socialist views could soon be elected.

Shearer and so many other Marxists realized that the only way to impose Marxist socialism on America was by way of the strategy outlined by Antonio Gramsci (pronounced "gram-shee"), the Italian communist, who had much time to think about such things while imprisoned for many years in Italy. His "Prison Notebooks" were widely read and studied by communists in the West. Gramsci analyzed Western culture and concluded that the only way that communists could finally impose their totalitarian will over the West was by first taking over its educational, cultural and religious institutions. This would require years of stealthful infiltration. The report quotes a passage from a book about Gramsci: Antonio Gramsci ... argued that power is best attained in developed, industrialized countries through a gradual process of radicalization of the cultural institutions (the "superstructure") of bourgeois society, a process that would in turn transform the values and morals of the society. Gramsci believed that as society's morals were softened, so its political and economic foundation would be more easily smashed and reconstructed........"

Washington Times 7/20/00 Kathryn Balmforth "…..Anyone wanting to understand the Clinton administration's true social agenda should spend some time watching the United States negotiate at the United Nations. The documents being negotiated are intended to shape international law, and international law is intruding, to a greater and greater degree, into the domestic arena. Nevertheless, there are few spectators and very little press coverage of United Nations proceedings. Most Americans ignore the United Nations. Consequently, the Clinton State Department feels free to take positions it would never openly espouse to the American public. ……….. For example, during the same week in 1996 that Bill Clinton was signing the Defense of Marriage Act - telling the American people he believed that marriage should be heterosexual - his State Department was at the United Nations Habitat Conference in Istanbul promoting language which would have required legal recognition of homosexual marriage. …….Last year, after the Columbine tragedy, Mr. Clinton was publicly calling on parents to exercise more control over their teen-age children. Simultaneously, however, U.S. diplomats negotiating at the United Nations "Cairo +5" conference were systematically trying to dismantle the legal framework of parental rights which allows parents to exercise such control. ………"

Communist Party website 10/00 "..... The next weeks are a time for all those on the side of the working class to step up to the plate and make history. The results of the 2000 elections will determine much about the decades to come. ......Will we be plummeted into a reactionary era of union busting, take backs, division and environmental destruction dictated by the ultra-right? Or will we broaden and deepen the fight against racism and bigotry, build new unity among labor and allies at the grass roots, and emerge in place to go on to the offensive for the needs of the working class and people? ......... Gore's emphasis on working families and his call that the presidency should fight for all the people is a reflection of the power of the successful organizing drives of the new labor movement. It is also a reflection of a new era of protest aimed at capitalist globalization and a new anti- corporate spirit among young people. ....... The working class is in motion. A victory by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney will set back that motion. A victory by the Democrats in the race for the presidency, the House and the Senate will allow the space to move to new heights of struggle and new forms of political independence. While the Green Party platform is good, it is lacking in the most important issue of this election - the necessity to defeat the ultra-right. In this tight, life-and-death election, the strongest anti-corporate vote is a vote for the ticket that can win against Bush/Cheney in 2000. ......"

The communist plan has always included the undermining of the family unit and other traditional elements of social structure. It should be no suprise that the communists so strongly favour and support the liberal left in North America.

I guess since siamese twins like communism and liberalism are joined at the hip, they dont consider themselves sharing the same bed. In instances like these, it becomes increasingly important to wake up on the Right side.

Yours in Truth,

The Sharpened Pen


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

Liberalism

August 14 2001, 3:19 PM 

2 Chronicles 7:14 says "If my people which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land. - This is what needs to happen to turn the tide people....

 
 Respond to this message   
UN Flag Burner

You hit the nail..

August 16 2001, 10:36 AM 

You hit the nail, the democratic party do not want democracy (where everyone with a gun goes down to the town square and raises hands to vote and elects someone to carry out the will of the people), instead they want socialism. However, the communists have also infultrated the republician party as well (so called moderate republicians). The Democrats are for a quick slide into communism, the Republicians are for a slow slide into communism. Both parties are nothing but tools for international communism. Vote Libertarian or Independant instead.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Communism and Liberalism - The Undeniable Link
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement