Again, let me state for all who read this that I am open to everyone's input regarding my question, but Pass, your answer is pretty much what I was thinking.
This however, would beg the question:
If not even the most conservative and hard-nosed opponents of illegal immigration suggest deporting/arresting all of the illegal aliens in our country, why is there so much rhetroic about being against amnesty? (e.g. "Amnesty! Amnesty! These people came here illegally, they are breaking the law and now we're giving them a free pass! That's not right." It sounds something like that.)
Perhaps the matter is related to people defining the term "amnesty" in different ways. The common sense way that I see it is, anything besides deporting or arresting illegal aliens is pretty much a form of amnesty. I suppose one could fine them monetarily, but I wouldn't consider that amnesty in my view but maybe just a modest form of civil punishment.
I welcome everyone's thoughts, including yours Pass, about my original question and the amnesty controversy (for lack of a better term).
Oh ... and I really do plan to share my thoughts about the NY driver's license to illegal aliens matter when I have the time. I have been researching and asking a lot of questions related to many aspects of illegal immigration, and the more I ask questions and learn, the more I realize how complicated this issue is. The NY driver's licnese debate has many, many gray areas and I'm not ready to take a position on it until I know more.
-Steve
_____________________________
Colorado Guy - New Mexico Guy - Montana Guy
