From: "thatstan" <stan@i...>
Date: Sun Oct 19, 2003 12:38 am
Subject: Flight 800 Independent Researchers Organization (FIRO) Probable Cause
FIRO (final?) TWA800 Probable Cause www.flight800.org
"A surface-to-air missile, launched from the ocean off the coast of
Long Island rose up and exploded at or near TWA Flight 800. The
explosion of the near-empty center wing fuel tank was a secondary
explosion, initiated by the explosion of a missile warhead. The
combined destructive power of the missile and the fuel tank
explosion caused catastrophic structural failure of TWA Flight 800."
I agree.
It would be speculative to further identify the missile
as 'terrorist' or 'friendly' with current data. I feel it is also
speculative to assume a warhead if a 'friendly' missile were used if
that is FIRO's conclusion.
I feel FIRO's 'probable cause' is consistent with the unproven so-
called sailors' story. To be continued (maybe). . . . <g>
--- In twa800@yahoogroups.com, "thatstan" <stan@i...> wrote:
> --- In twa800@yahoogroups.com, "elmerbarr" <eb44@m...> wrote:
> > From the Donaldson brothers TWA800 website
>
> > Independent Group Will Release TWA 800 Probable Cause
Determination
> > Falmouth, MA October 02, 2003
>
> > FIRO
> > claims that their findings account for the evidence more
completely
> > than
> > the government's theory of a spark inside a fuel tank.
>
> > According to FIRO Chairman Dr. Thomas Stalcup, "the evidence
speaks
> > for
> > itself and is quite convincing, once it's all on the table."
>
> That evidence will then be shown to
> > support
> > a theory for the crash that accounts for nearly all of the
available
> > evidence.
>
> I'd certainly like to see what FIRO came up with as their official
> final theory but I can't find anything more on the internet. My
guess
> is FIRO will go no further than 'a missile done it.'
>
> I think they may go one step more to a 'friendly fire.' I would.
>
> If anybody hears more about FIRO's secret of what caused the
tragedy
> I hope they'll post it. I expect it to be technically sound.
I am convinced it was technically sound. I hope this helps. Stan
|