Vintage Timex Watch Forum



Welcome to the Vintage Timex Watch Forum, a resource for those interested in vintageTimex watches and history. This forum ran for several years, and has now ceased operations. The forum posts remain in place, and we have created an Archive of select posts. Please click here to visit the Archives. Entire Forum along with all posts can be deleted in its entirety, at any time, for any reason by Forum Owner.

Contact: Alan

This site is not affiliated with the Timex Corporation


Go to:   Home      NEW TIMEX FORUM CLICK HERE TO VISIT !!!      [ ]      Sales Page      W      

Read only forum. No posting.View all messagesSearch Timex
  • what does NOS mean ?. on Oct 12, 2005, 10:59 PM
    • NOS----NEW OLD STOCK. on Oct 13, 2005, 1:00 AM
    • It means NEW OLD STOCK....(more). on Oct 13, 2005, 1:05 AM
  • Timex Electric pics. on Oct 12, 2005, 12:18 PM
    • NICE WATCH!! Interesting dial. Would love to have one of those in my collection. (nt). on Oct 12, 2005, 12:31 PM
    • Me too just my sort of thing! Wonderful nt. rltbod on Oct 12, 2005, 12:44 PM
    • A beautiful Timex.... on Oct 12, 2005, 1:00 PM
      • Coil repair (pic). on Oct 12, 2005, 3:11 PM
    • Clean, modern, sporty look.... technoguy on Oct 12, 2005, 1:49 PM
      • hairspring. on Oct 12, 2005, 3:25 PM
    • Funny. on Oct 12, 2005, 3:34 PM
      • Bill, are you sure? :) nt. on Oct 12, 2005, 3:59 PM
        • No. on Oct 12, 2005, 4:16 PM
  • how do you pull the hands. jwalk on Oct 11, 2005, 9:20 PM
    • Re: how do you pull the hands. RonD. on Oct 11, 2005, 10:51 PM
    • About hand removal.... technoguy on Oct 12, 2005, 3:06 AM
    • Rough draft. on Oct 12, 2005, 8:48 AM
  • 14K Gold Electric Waterproof. Ted on Oct 11, 2005, 5:58 PM
    • Pictures, please.....(more). on Oct 11, 2005, 6:52 PM
    • Is it a.... on Oct 12, 2005, 1:49 AM
    • Kunt is right.... John on Oct 12, 2005, 10:29 AM
    • Nice watch to receive! (nt). on Oct 12, 2005, 12:21 PM
      • Pictures are on the way. Ted on Oct 12, 2005, 2:37 PM
        • Great to hear about future pictures..... on Oct 12, 2005, 3:31 PM
          • The 14K Electric back-set .... Knut on Oct 12, 2005, 3:41 PM
            • Where can I find . . . .. Ted on Oct 12, 2005, 4:44 PM
              • Find it here. on Oct 12, 2005, 4:55 PM
    • Ted if you.... John on Oct 12, 2005, 9:47 PM
  • What battery for this?. on Oct 11, 2005, 1:36 PM
    • Men's electrics. on Oct 11, 2005, 2:15 PM
    • WOW.... John on Oct 11, 2005, 2:59 PM
    • You may use.... on Oct 11, 2005, 3:16 PM
      • Re: You may use.... C.W. on Oct 11, 2005, 4:07 PM
        • Two things.... John on Oct 11, 2005, 4:25 PM
        • 303 and 357. Bill T on Oct 11, 2005, 9:43 PM
        • battery specs. rob t on Oct 12, 2005, 2:31 AM
          • No longer applies. on Oct 12, 2005, 8:29 AM
  • looking for a 1967 timex. on Oct 11, 2005, 12:48 AM
  • Watch Wiki has moved. on Oct 10, 2005, 1:46 PM
    • Watch Wiki has moved. FredOlsen on Oct 12, 2005, 3:34 PM
      • Battery Equivilancy chart. on Oct 12, 2005, 4:05 PM
  • Mystery 80s winder.... on Oct 9, 2005, 9:16 PM
    • Possible Production Numbers Location. on Oct 9, 2005, 10:27 PM
    • 1983.... on Oct 10, 2005, 1:44 AM
      • Nope.. C.W. on Oct 10, 2005, 9:48 AM
        • I wonder.... on Oct 10, 2005, 9:59 AM
    • Something similar... Scott on Oct 10, 2005, 12:39 PM
    • How about the number. rob t on Oct 10, 2005, 12:42 PM
    • Re: Mystery 80s winder.... rltbod on Oct 10, 2005, 5:48 PM
  • Timex 100. on Oct 8, 2005, 5:31 PM
    • Your Timex 100.... on Oct 9, 2005, 12:25 PM
  • Speaking of breaking rules.... RonD. on Oct 7, 2005, 11:22 PM
    • I must agree.... technoguy on Oct 8, 2005, 6:24 AM
    • I agree.... on Oct 8, 2005, 6:36 AM
    • Ditto: I also agree (nt). on Oct 8, 2005, 8:54 AM
    • Re: Speaking of breaking rules.... on Oct 8, 2005, 1:59 PM
    • Agree. You can 'bookmark' the auctions you like.... Alan N. on Oct 8, 2005, 3:52 PM
    • re. speaking rules..... on Oct 8, 2005, 6:02 PM
    • I agree.... John on Oct 9, 2005, 12:42 PM
  • What is the most vintage look of the current. c chambers on Oct 7, 2005, 7:31 PM
    • That would be.... on Oct 8, 2005, 6:46 AM
    • I think the Marlin is out of production???????????????. c chambers on Oct 8, 2005, 11:59 PM
      • I guess they all.... on Oct 9, 2005, 3:01 PM
  • Lots of Timex parts!. on Oct 7, 2005, 12:30 PM
    • Check the rules. on Oct 7, 2005, 2:17 PM
      • Apologies. on Oct 7, 2005, 3:12 PM
        • I know, Wrong place!. on Oct 7, 2005, 7:34 PM
  • Bill D. The Electric.... John on Oct 7, 2005, 10:49 AM
    • To answer. on Oct 7, 2005, 12:01 PM
    • Re: Bill D. The Electric.... Scott on Oct 7, 2005, 12:41 PM
      • Electric cleaning - contact spray.... on Oct 7, 2005, 2:56 PM
  • A Timex Automatic ( pic. - just another restoration... ). on Oct 7, 2005, 10:41 AM
    • A correction.... on Oct 7, 2005, 10:57 AM
    • Nice one Knut.. rob t on Oct 7, 2005, 11:31 AM
    • Yes that is a nice one.. Jose on Oct 7, 2005, 5:36 PM
    • A real .... John on Oct 7, 2005, 7:58 PM
      • Different names.... on Oct 10, 2005, 12:32 PM
  • dont fix it if it aint broke............ on Oct 5, 2005, 8:30 PM
  • dynabeat info please. on Oct 5, 2005, 5:07 PM
    • sorry I dont know but.... rob t on Oct 7, 2005, 11:36 AM
    • Dynabeats. on Oct 7, 2005, 9:29 PM
  • Thanks to WiKi. on Oct 5, 2005, 10:19 AM
    • No savvy required. on Oct 5, 2005, 11:11 AM
      • Done. on Oct 6, 2005, 9:28 AM
  • Timex Auto related. rob t on Oct 4, 2005, 11:04 PM
    • I saw that watch. on Oct 4, 2005, 11:33 PM
    • What about the back?.... technoguy on Oct 5, 2005, 8:52 AM
  • Sevesteen on "ink stamps". John on Oct 4, 2005, 2:15 PM
    • Misremembered. on Oct 4, 2005, 3:00 PM
  • timex electric 70's question dust cover stops watch from working. on Oct 3, 2005, 11:32 PM
    • Whu'? Dust? Cover?. C.W. on Oct 4, 2005, 3:22 AM
    • That "dust" cover.... on Oct 4, 2005, 3:54 AM
      • that dust cover. on Oct 4, 2005, 4:35 AM
        • Running fast.... on Oct 4, 2005, 4:58 AM
    • About that "dust cover".... technoguy on Oct 4, 2005, 5:08 AM
    • Same problem. on Oct 4, 2005, 8:07 AM
      • found problem with watch. on Oct 4, 2005, 1:45 PM
        • also........ on Oct 4, 2005, 1:48 PM
  • I FOUND THE PRICE LIST FOR THE NEW TIMEX AUTO'S..(more). on Oct 3, 2005, 12:38 PM
    • I'm not sure.... on Oct 3, 2005, 1:24 PM
      • Re: I'm not sure.... on Oct 3, 2005, 1:44 PM
    • Timex Auto Prices. rob t on Oct 3, 2005, 7:31 PM
    • No Luck With My Local Retailers. on Oct 3, 2005, 7:55 PM
      • I looked at stores in my area. on Oct 4, 2005, 11:42 PM
    • I'd pay that.. C.W. on Oct 4, 2005, 2:12 AM
  • Yesterday. on Oct 3, 2005, 7:25 AM
    • I plan to go at sometime. on Oct 3, 2005, 4:10 PM
    • Phillip Gonsher is the Only Forum Visitor to Timex Museum. on Oct 3, 2005, 8:00 PM
  • Plastic cased Timex opens through crystal?. Ed Schweiger on Oct 3, 2005, 12:59 AM
    • Stem removal.... technoguy on Oct 3, 2005, 2:57 AM
    • You might.... John on Oct 3, 2005, 11:13 AM
    • Re: Plastic cased Timex opens through crystal?. RonD. on Oct 3, 2005, 5:38 PM
      • Still no luck getting the movement out.. Ed Schweiger on Oct 4, 2005, 1:39 AM
      • I got it. (But I wasn't supposed to). Ed Schweiger on Oct 5, 2005, 1:19 AM
        • Re: I got it. (But I wasn't supposed to). RonD. on Oct 6, 2005, 9:22 AM
        • How to do it. on Oct 6, 2005, 6:55 PM
          • Thanks..... John on Oct 7, 2005, 10:25 AM
            • Yep. on Oct 7, 2005, 6:44 PM
  • Watch Wiki. on Oct 2, 2005, 11:37 AM
    • Great Start. on Oct 2, 2005, 11:24 PM
      • Post it!. on Oct 3, 2005, 8:11 AM
  • OT: Watchmaker.... on Oct 2, 2005, 7:11 AM
    • What a "watchmaker" used to be.... technoguy on Oct 3, 2005, 2:51 AM
      • "Blind Watchmaker". John on Oct 3, 2005, 11:21 AM
      • Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. Greg Ward on Oct 3, 2005, 4:18 PM
        • Re: Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. rltbod on Oct 3, 2005, 5:16 PM
          • Re: Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. Greg Ward on Oct 3, 2005, 5:32 PM
            • Interested in your opinion.... on Oct 4, 2005, 2:59 AM
        • Great verbage. Bill D on Oct 3, 2005, 5:23 PM
        • Timex clues. on Oct 3, 2005, 9:22 PM
      • Blahhh! I'm with you on this one, Tech'!. C.W. on Oct 4, 2005, 2:37 AM
      • More on watchmaking.... technoguy on Oct 4, 2005, 4:45 AM
        • Agreed!. on Oct 4, 2005, 5:13 AM
    • LET'S BE CAREFUL!!! Do we want Alan to shut down the Forum, again? (more). on Oct 4, 2005, 2:54 PM
  • BETTER PIX of the NEW TIMEX AUTO'S....(more). on Oct 1, 2005, 12:21 AM
    • Q re case mat'l. rob t on Oct 1, 2005, 4:28 AM
      • Re: Q re case mat'l. on Oct 1, 2005, 7:29 AM
    • Water resistent.... John on Oct 3, 2005, 11:29 AM
      • No tech specs that I have been able to find. (nt). on Oct 3, 2005, 1:37 PM
  • Inkstamp code help. on Sep 30, 2005, 9:28 PM
    • Ink stamps.... C.W. on Sep 30, 2005, 11:27 PM
      • Ink stamps.... Fred. Olsen on Oct 2, 2005, 5:29 PM
        • Hmmm.... C.W. on Oct 2, 2005, 9:43 PM
          • Re: Hmmm.... on Oct 2, 2005, 11:34 PM
    • Seiko production numbers. RonD. on Sep 30, 2005, 11:49 PM
    • The date code.... John on Oct 3, 2005, 11:46 AM
      • 61 doesn't work. on Oct 3, 2005, 1:22 PM
        • Inkstamp Code. RMF on Oct 3, 2005, 2:02 PM
          • Probably not switched. on Oct 3, 2005, 3:17 PM
        • I would agree.... John on Oct 3, 2005, 8:09 PM
  • OK....HERE THEY ARE HERE.....THE NEW AUTO'S....(more). on Sep 30, 2005, 8:38 AM
    • Excited?. Jose on Sep 30, 2005, 4:40 PM
    • Thanks Ed. on Sep 30, 2005, 5:03 PM
      • You're welcome, Dorsey. I, too, will buy one just because...(more). on Sep 30, 2005, 5:39 PM
    • Great looking watches... RonD. on Sep 30, 2005, 5:48 PM
      • They look... ( movement ). on Oct 1, 2005, 3:51 AM
    • Not bad....but..... technoguy on Oct 1, 2005, 5:10 AM
      • Re: Not bad....but..... RonD. on Oct 1, 2005, 6:54 AM
      • Re: Not bad....but..... on Oct 1, 2005, 7:35 AM
  • And what about Mercurys?. on Sep 29, 2005, 6:42 PM
    • Dorsey is an expert at ID'ing Timex models. (more). on Sep 29, 2005, 8:13 PM
    • near as I can tell. on Sep 29, 2005, 8:28 PM
      • This stuff.... C.W. on Sep 30, 2005, 12:09 AM
        • Very sneaky, Charlie. on Sep 30, 2005, 7:39 AM
          • well.... C.W on Oct 4, 2005, 3:31 AM
    • Based on the service manual.... on Sep 29, 2005, 9:12 PM
      • So, from what you say.... C.W. on Sep 30, 2005, 12:08 AM
        • Can't tell from the picture.... on Sep 30, 2005, 8:13 AM
  • What can you tell me about Sprites?. on Sep 29, 2005, 6:16 PM
    • Usual suspects.... C.W. on Sep 29, 2005, 6:33 PM
      • I don't know all the Sprites.... Alan N. on Sep 30, 2005, 12:12 PM
        • out of my depth. rltbod on Sep 30, 2005, 2:09 PM
          • Re. "Sprite" series.... on Sep 30, 2005, 3:11 PM
          • Timex Taxonomy. C.W. on Sep 30, 2005, 11:24 PM
  • What can you tell me?. Jamie0S on Sep 29, 2005, 1:33 PM
    • that beautiful!!!!!!. on Sep 29, 2005, 2:03 PM
    • With that dial.... Knut on Sep 29, 2005, 2:17 PM
    • Ok, yes.... Jamie0S on Sep 29, 2005, 3:20 PM
    • Looks like the Omega Dynamic <nt>. rob t on Sep 29, 2005, 4:34 PM
      • Omega Dynamic. on Sep 30, 2005, 9:45 AM
    • Totally disagree with the others. Jose on Sep 30, 2005, 4:49 PM
  • Article in today's NY Times. RMF on Sep 29, 2005, 11:09 AM
    • Sorry but.... John on Sep 29, 2005, 4:40 PM
    • THANKS for the article...Excellent!! (nt). on Sep 29, 2005, 8:07 PM
  • Automatics May Be On The Way!. KSR on Sep 29, 2005, 1:04 AM
    • That is such good news!. on Sep 29, 2005, 1:31 AM
      • Now THAT'S a Viscount!!!.